![]() ![]() While I share several of the points of criticism of the two reviews, I don’t share most of them, because they are either simply not true (missing features that just were not found), show incomplete testing (for a fair comparison the tools should be compared on all operating systems where at least one of them is running, by OS and as cross comparison. Hope the rest of the article fulfils what I have teased above.ītw., the German photo podcast happy shooting talked about a darktable test as well, with similar preconditions (apple computer, adobe user), and while the tester tries not to be too harsh or even friendly, his conclusion is rather extremely negative. direct export to gimp, the possibility to change colours of UI by css, …), so it could have improved the article if the author had asked our community before finalization of this article.ĭisclaimer: I only read the conclusion, it’s already late here. Several of the missing functionalities the article mentions are availably by lua extensions or otherwise (e.g. For these preconditions, the conclusion of the article is not too bad. ![]() Furthermore, he tested on an apple computer, and there are many indications that darktable runs a lot less fluent on these. It is written by an adobe user, and he was working only two weeks with darktable. ![]() First, I appreciate that they, as a magazine owned by a publisher of subject literature, publish such a review, especially since they earn their money with how-to-adobe books. In the latest German (PDF) online photo magazine “fotoespresso” issue, an extensive review of darktable is published. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |